移民资讯管理学视角：为什么在美国担任领导职位的群体中，人数相对不足的是

User avatar
The leadership attainment gap between East Asians and South Asians was consistently explained by cultural differences in assertiveness
Assertiveness seems to be the key factor here. East Asians are taught from a young age to not be assertive and to do whatever your elders tell you. Furthermore, there is an extremely judgmental attitude about people who speak out or pursue something & fail - like a bunch of gossipers, East Asians will bring each other down.

东亚人和南亚人攫取领导职位方面的差距一直都是以自信/胆魄方面的文化差异来解释的。
自信/胆魄似乎是这里的关键因素。东亚人从小就被教育不要自信，长辈要求你什么你就去照做。此外，对于那些敢于畅所欲言或是去追求些什么然后失败了的人，会存在一种非常极端的批判心态，就像一群搬弄是非之徒的嘴脸，东亚人会互相扯后腿。

[dexed]
South Asians due to their long association with whites, know how to work the whites.
Also EASEA are not as trusted. Imagine the outrage if a Chinese guy becomes the CEO of Google.
Don't forget anti Japanese business sentiments were very strong.
EASEA companies are doing way better though. That's more important.

由于长期与白人来往，南亚人深谙玩转白人的方法。
另外东亚人也不那么容易被信任。想象一下，如果一个华人男成为谷歌的首席执行官，会引发多大的愤慨。
不要忘了，护照移民，反对日企的情绪一度非常高涨。
不过，东亚/东南亚人的公司的发展比其他公司好得多。这才是更为重要的。

TrekkieSolar
Not sure if this is included in the study, but a lot of these South Asian CEOs are usually 1G immigrants from India who are among the best and brightest in the country (eg. Satya Nadella, Indra Nooyi, Sundar Pichai) and relatively privileged too (went to the right schools, have access to networks in the US and back home, usually aren't first-gen college students, etc). Both qualities make a big difference in your ability to move up the corporate ladder - I don't doubt that a lot of EAs who immigrate are among the best and the brightest in their country, but given how much China/Korea/Japan has boomed in the last few decades I'd imagine there's more reward to staying home.

我不确定这项研究是否包括了这一点，但很多南亚裔首席执行官通常都是来自印度的第一代移民，他们是该国最优秀、最聪明的人（比如说，萨蒂亚·纳德拉、印德拉·努伊、桑达尔·皮查伊），也是相对而言享有特权的人士（上对了学校，在美国和本国都有人脉网络，通常都不是第一代大学生，等等）。这两种特质对你在企业中向上爬的能力大有影响，我不怀疑很多东亚裔移民是他们本国最优秀、最聪明的人，但鉴于中国/韩国/日本在过去几十年中的急速发展，我想留在国内回报会更大。

Other reasons are community cohesiveness, English fluency + anglo culture familiarity, and not being perceived as a threat by the US. The latter is pretty evident with the US losing its shit over China today and Japan in the 70s/80s - which has consequences for anyone who looks East Asian - so I'm not going to go into it too much. It's also not something we can control. The first two however make a huge difference that isn't talked about as openly.

其他原因包括族群凝聚力，投资移民，英语流利度+熟谙英国文化的程度，以及不被美国视为威胁。最后一点，在今天的美国对中国以及七八十年代的美国对日本的失态中就可见一斑了，这一点，会给任何长得像东亚人的人带来后果，所以我也不打算深挖这个问题。这就不是我们可以控制的。但前两点带来的巨大影响并没有被公开谈论。
原创翻译：龙腾网 转载请注明出处

Indian immigrants tend to be more familiar with English and western cultural norms than the average EA immigrant, and organize themselves around caste/ethnic/regional communities more so than how I understand EAs do. In practice, this means that Mr. Patel will come from India to the US, hustle to open a motel or start a company, then get his extended family/friends from the Patel community here to work with him, after which they'll branch off and repeat the process. Similarly, if Mr. Iyer comes here and gets a job with Cisco, he'll hire a few more Tamil Brahmins to join his team, and they'll hire a ton more junior engineers from colleges in India, and eventually they'll branch off into their own teams and companies, and so on and so forth. Then when it comes time to get promoted, they'll have a ton of people who have their back, and are familiar enough with norms + don't have to deal with racialized paranoia about China/Japan taking over to the point where they can get promoted and move up the ladder more easily.

印度移民往往比普通的东亚移民更熟悉英语和西方文化规范，而且相比于我理解中的东亚移民，印度移民更多会围绕种姓/民族/地区社群来自我组织。在具体操作上，这就意味着帕特尔先生会从印度来到美国，拼命努力开出一家汽车旅馆或公司，然后让当地帕特尔社区中的大家庭/朋友和他一起工作，之后他们会散出去各自发展并重复这个过程。类似地，如果耶尔先生（译注：耶尔为泰米尔人中的常见姓氏）来到这里，并在思科公司找到了一份工作，他就会雇佣更多泰米尔人中的婆罗门加入他的团队，而他们又会雇佣海量来自印度大学的初级工程师，最终他们会散出去组建自己的团队和公司，如此往复。之后，当获得晋升的时刻来临，他们就会有一大堆人在背后支持他们，而且对规范足够熟悉，还不必去处理因中国人/日本人接管而产生的种族化偏执，都到了能让他们更容易地完成晋升和向上爬的程度。